Efficiency of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnONPs) in Callus Induction and Physiological Growth of Portulaca oleracea Seedlings under Water Stress Conditions

Section: Articles

Abstract

   This study aimed to evaluate the effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) on the growth and response of Portulaca oleracea L. Portulaca oleracea under water stress conditions in tissue culture. The experiment was conducted using MS medium supplemented with different concentrations (0.3, 0.6, and 0.9) of ZnONPs and under three water levels (50%, 70%, and 100%) to simulate water stress. Callus induction and growth were studied, in addition to measuring fresh and dry weight, protein percentage, and proline content after 30 and 60 days of culture. The results showed that the average concentration of 0.6 mg/L of ZnONPs accelerated callus induction and increased its efficiency, improved fresh and dry weight, and increased protein and proline content, especially under moderate and severe water stress conditions. In contrast, higher concentrations (0.9 mg/L) showed an inhibitory effect on most of the studied traits, demonstrating the dual nature of ZnONPs' effect, acting as both stimulatory and inhibitory depending on the concentration used. The results also showed the superiority of peduncles over nodes in callus induction. This study suggests that incorporating zinc oxide nanoparticles into tissue culture systems represents a promising approach for enhancing callus growth and mitigating the effects of water stress, while emphasizing the importance of selecting the optimal concentration to achieve the best physiological response.

References

  1. Al-Bakr, R.A. (2018). Propagation of Portulaca oleracea L. and level of active compounds in callus culture. IJERSTE, 7(2), 33-43
  2. Alharthi, B., & Alqahtani, S. (2024). Physiological and biochemical responses of plants to nanoparticles under abiotic stress. Plants, 13(4), 512.
  3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (2000). Official Methods of Analysis (17th ed.). AOAC International, Washington, DC.
  4. Dimkpa, C. O., & Bindraban, P. S. (2017). Zinc oxide nanoparticles and plant secondary metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65, 663–671.
  5. FAO. (2023). Desertification and land degradation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  6. George, E. F., Hall, M. A., & De Klerk, G.-J. (2008). Plant propagation by tissue culture (3rd ed.). Springer.
  7. Gupta, B., & Huang, B. (2014). Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. International Journal of Genomics, 2014, 1–18.
  8. Hayat, S., Hayat, Q., Alyemeni, M. N., Wani, A. S., Pichtel, J., & Ahmad, A. (2012). Role of proline under changing environments: A review. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 7(11), 1456–1466.
  9. Ikeuchi, M., Sugimoto, K., & Iwase, A. (2019). Plant callus: mechanisms of dedifferentiation and reprogramming. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 70, 535–560.
  10. Khan, M. N., et al. (2023). Nanoparticles-mediated regulation of plant growth and stress tolerance: Physiological and biochemical perspectives. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 197, 107635.
  11. Kumar, A., & Li, Y. (2024). Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture. Trends in Plant Science, 29(1), 45–58.
  12. Kumar, V., & Sharma, S. (2024). Plant tissue culture techniques and applications. Plant Cell Reports, 43, 215–230.
  13. Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473–497.
  14. Nair, A. S., Abraham, T. K., & Jaya, D. S. (2010). Studies on the changes in proline metabolism in drought tolerant and susceptible cultivars of rice. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 32, 579–584.
  15. Nguyen, D. T., & Tran, T. H. (2022). Zinc oxide nanoparticles and drought tolerance in plants. Plant Nanobiotechnology, 4, 55–67.
  16. Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Rehman, M. Z. U., Rinklebe, J., Tsang, D. C. W., Bashir, A., & Ok, Y. S. (2023). Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate drought stress in plants. Science of the Total Environment, 858, 159795.
  17. Sharma, A., et al. (2023). Proline metabolism and its role in plant tolerance to drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 198, 107673
  18. Szabados, L., & Savouré, A. (2010). Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Science, 15(2), 89–97.
  19. Tripathi, D. K., Singh, S., Singh, S., Mishra, S., Chauhan, D. K., & Dubey, N. K. (2017). Uptake, accumulation and toxicity of metal-based nanoparticles in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 110, 2–12.
  20. Tripathi, D. K., Vishwakarma, K., Sharma, S., & Chauhan, D. K. (2023). Nanoparticles and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Stress, 9, 100182.
  21. Verbruggen, N., & Hermans, C. (2008). Proline accumulation in plants: A review. Amino Acids, 35(4), 753–759.
  22. Zafar, S., Perveen, S., & Naeem, M. (2022). Role of zinc in plant growth and protein synthesis under stress conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 45, 1321–1334.
  23. Zhang, H., Chen, G., & Li, J. (2022). Applications of nanomaterials in agriculture and environmental sustainability. Environmental Science & Technology, 56, 15284–15296.
  24. Zhou, W., Li, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). Desertification dynamics and mitigation strategies under climate change. Journal of Arid Environments, 221, 105062.

Identifiers

Statistics

Copyright and Licensing